|
As
management continues to right size our work force we will see an increase
in overtime hours to cover the shortage in the workforce. Along with
this increase of overtime come increasing attempts by management to deny
the Bargaining Unit of its rights. Article 8 overtime provisions of
the Collective Bargaining Agreement has been arbitrated and been put to
rest, I thought… I see some of the same issues that we fought hard
and long for resurfacing.
The
question of working over 60 hours within a service week continues to
surface even after being settled 16 years ago. The issue of 12/60 work
hour limitations and the appropriate remedy when management allows you to
work beyond the daily/weekly work limitation has been a problem since the
1988 settlement.
A brief
history of this 12-hour daily 60-hour weekly limitation would be in
order. The issue was arbitrated before Arbitrator Richard Mittenthal back
in 1986 and 1987. Several questions were presented to him for
interpretation.
Whether a violation of article
8, section 5G2, i.e., working an employee more than 12 hours in a day or
60 hours in a service week, justifies a remedy apart from beyond the
penalty overtime pay provided by article 8, section 4C and D? If so what
would be the remedy?
Mittenthal ruled in part that Article 8, Section 5G2 does establish an
absolute bar against employees working more than 60 hours in a service
week. The pay question was remanded back to the parties for further
consideration.
Whether an employee sent home in
the middle of his tour on a regularly scheduled day, because of the bar
against employees working more than 60 hours in a service week, is
entitled to be paid?
He
additionally ruled that an employee having been sent home on his regularly
scheduled day before the end of his tour on account of the 60- hour
ceiling and having experienced no temporary change of schedule, must be
paid for the hours he lost that day.
Whether management may ignore
the pecking order in a holiday period scheduling, as established by
article 11 section 6B or a local Memorandum of understanding in order to
avoid payment of penalty overtime pay under article 8?
Management may not ignore the “pecking
order” in a holiday period scheduling under Article 11, Section 6 in order
to avoid penalty overtime pay under Article 8.
Management may not treat regular volunteers for holiday period work as
having volunteered for up to 12 hours on whatever day(s) they are asked to
work.
He also remanded the remedy back to the
parties in this grievance. As a result of Arbitrator Mittenthal’s
decisions to remand the remedies back to the parties the following
memorandum came into existence.
The United States Postal Service, NALC
and the APWU agreed to compensate the aggrieved employees an additional 50
percent premium of the base hourly straight time rate for those limited
instances when employees are permitted to work beyond the 12/60
limitation.
Memorandum of Understanding
Between
The United States Postal Service
And The American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO
And The National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO
The
United States Postal Service, the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO,
and the National Association of Letter Carriers, AFL-CIO, hereby agree to
resolve the following issues, which remain in dispute and arise from the
application of the overtime and holiday provisions of Articles 8 and 11 of
the 1984 and 1987 National Agreements. The parties agree further to
remand those grievances which were timely filed and which involve the
issues set forth herein for resolution in accordance with the terms of
this Memorandum of Understanding.
12
Hours In A Work Day and 60 Hours In a Service Week Restrictions
The parties agree that with the
exception of December, full-time employees are prohibited from working
more than 12 hours in a single workday or 60 hours within a service week.
In those limited instances where this provision is or has been violated
and a timely grievance filed, full-time employees will be compensated at
an additional premium of 50 percent of the base hourly straight time rate
for those hours worked beyond the 12 or 60-hour limitation.
The employment of this remedy shall not be construed as an agreement by
the parties that the Employer may exceed the 12 and 60-hour limitation
with impunity.
As a means of facilitating the
foregoing, the parties agree that excluding December, once a full-time
employee reaches 20 hours of overtime within a service week, the employee
is no longer available for any additional overtime work. Furthermore, the
employee’s tour of duty shall be terminated once he or she reaches the 60th
hour of work, in accordance with Arbitrator Mittenthal’s National Level
Arbitration Award on this issue, dated September 11, 1987, in case numbers
H4N-NA-C 21 (3rd issue) and H4C-NA-C 27.
Holiday Work
The parties agree that the Employer may
not refuse to comply with the holiday scheduling “pecking order”
provisions of Article 11, Section 6 or the provisions of a Local
Memorandum of Understanding in order to avoid payment of penalty overtime.
The parties further agree to remedy past
and future violations of the above understanding as follows:
1. Full-time
employees and part-time regular employees who file a timely grievance
because they were improperly assigned to work their holiday or designated
holiday will be compensated at an additional premium of 50 percent of the
base hourly straight time rate.
2. For
each full-time employee or part-time regular employee improperly assigned
to work a holiday or designated holiday, the Employer will compensate the
employee who should have worked but was not permitted to do so, pursuant
to the provisions of Article 11, Section 6, or pursuant to a Local
Memorandum of Understanding at the rate of pay the employee would have
earned had he or she worked on that holiday.
The above settles the holiday remedy
question, which was remanded to the parties by Arbitrator Mittenthal in
his January 19, 1987 decision in H4N-NA-C 21 and H4N-NA-C 24.
As with every agreement the parties
enter into with the Postal Service, it never seems to put the issue to
rest. Additional disputes are always guaranteed to surface.
The following information is from the
New York Metro USPS/APWU Joint Contract Application Manual.
This manual may not be applicable for
your area but the references and resources sure are. This information is
only provided to assist you in protecting your rights.
Questions
and Answers
If
management violates the 12-hour or 60-hour restriction, what is the remedy
for said violation?
Response: In instances where this
provision is or has been violated and a timely grievance is filed, the
full-time employee(s) will be compensated at an additional premium of 50
percent of the base hourly straight time rate for those hours worked
beyond the 12 or 60 hour limitation.
Source:
MOU between USPS, NALC and the APWU, October 19, 1988. National
Arbitration Award, H4M-NA-C 21 and H4C-NA-C 27, Mittenthal, fourth
issue), A90N-4A-C 94042668, Snow
After a full time employee reaches 20
hours of overtime within a service week is he/she still available for
overtime?
Response: No. Once the employee
reaches 20 hours of overtime within a service week, the employee is no
longer available for any additional overtime work.
Source:
MOU between USPS, NALC and APWU, October 19, 1988.
What is management’s obligation when an
employee reaches the 60th hour of work?
Response: The employee’s tour
of duty shall be terminated once he/she reaches the 60th hour
of work.
Source:
MOU between USPS, NALC and the APWU, October 19, 1988. National
Arbitration Award, H4M-NA-C 21 and H4C-NA-C 27.
Does paid leave count toward the 12 and
60 work limits?
Response: Yes
Is an employee who is sent home in the
middle of the tour on a regularly schedule day, because of the bar against
employees working more than 60 hours in a service week, entitled to be
paid for the remainder of his scheduled day?
Response: Yes, an employee
having been sent home on his regularly scheduled day before the end of his
tour due to the 60-hour ceiling and having experience no temporary change
of schedule, must be compensated for the hours he lost that day.
Source:
National Arbitration Award, September 11, 1987, Arbitrator Mittenthal
H4M-NA-C 21 and H4C-NA-C 27.
Does “Holiday Work Pay” count towards
the 56 and 60 hour work limits?
Response: No. “Holiday Work Pay” is
a premium paid to eligible employees for hours worked on a holiday.
However, since employees are given credit for paid leave on a holiday,
the holiday leave time would count toward the 56 and 60 hour
limits.
Source: ELM 434
As clear as
the language and the arbitrations cited may seem, we still continue to see
violations of the 12/60 limits. If you work beyond the 12/60 limitations
you MUST file a grievance for the additional 50 percent premium.
You are still entitled to the premium even if you take paid leave during
the time frame. If you need additional information or copies of the
arbitration awards or the memorandum of understanding please contact me.
This information is only provided to assist you, contact your local union
representative to see if your rights have been violated.
|